Why the study?
Does FR190997 prevent the development of hypertension in young spontaneously hypertensive rats?
Does FR190997 prevent the development of hypertension in young spontaneously hypertensive rats?
A nonpeptide B2 agonist, FR190997, blunts the development of hypertension when continuously infused during the critical phase in young spontaneously hypertensive rats.
B2 agonism may blunt hypertension in young SHR; hypothesis-generating and should not inform human therapy.
We tested whether FR190997, a nonpeptide B(2) agonist, prevented the development of hypertension in young spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR), which secrete less kallikrein into the urine than do Wistar-Kyoto rats. An intra-arterial (IA) injection of FR190997 (0.3 to 30 nmol/kg) caused dose-dependent hypotension in conscious Sprague-Dawley rats. Although the maximum hypotensive potency of FR190997 equaled that of bradykinin, its action lasted approximately 10 times as long. Hoe140 (100 nmol/kg IA) significantly blocked the hypotensive response induced by FR190997 (10 nmol/kg). Atropine (100 nmol/kg IA) did not affect this response. A selective infusion of FR190997 into the renal artery induced natriuresis and diuresis in anesthetized rabbits. A continuous infusion (2 nmol. 10 mL(-1). h(-1) per rat) of FR190997 into the abdominal aorta of young SHR (6 weeks old, n=6) for 6 days significantly (P<0.05) reduced mean blood pressure to 114+/-6 (day 2) and 110+/-6 (day 5) mm Hg, from 149+/-7 and 162+/-6 mm Hg, respectively, in vehicle-infused rats (n=6). At 8 days after continuous infusion (day 14), mean blood pressure (148+/-5 mm Hg) in FR190997-infused rats remained significantly (P<0. 05) lower than that in vehicle-infused rats (190+/-6 mm Hg), almost the peak value. The mesenteric artery isolated from FR190997-treated rats (day 14) had lower contractile sensitivity to norepinephrine than that from vehicle-treated rats. These results suggested that the continuous infusion of a nonpeptide B(2) agonist may prevent hypertension if performed in the critical phase.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Majima et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: