Why the study?
Do Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure?
Do Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ARBs provide a well-tolerated alternative to ACE inhibitors for reducing morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure.
Heart failure remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, despite major advances in therapy. Angiotensin II, the principal mediator of the renin-angiotensin system, exerts both short-term (e.g., hemodynamic, renal) and long-term (e.g., inflammation, cardiac remodeling) effects in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease. The effects of angiotensin II appear to be more completely inhibited by angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), which act at the subtype 1 receptor level, than by angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors because pathways other than that of ACE contribute to the generation of angiotensin II. Evidence demonstrates that ARBs, when added to conventional treatment for patients with heart failure, are associated with a reduction in morbidity and mortality as well as an improvement in quality of life. Clinical trials of ARB therapy indicate that these agents are generally well tolerated, both alone and in combination with other neurohormonal inhibitors. The current role of ARBs in heart failure is as an alternative for patients who cannot tolerate therapy with an ACE inhibitor. A number of ongoing clinical studies are likely to further define or expand the role of ARBs in the treatment of cardiovascular disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J. Herbert Patterson (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: