Key result
Angiotensin receptor blockers were reviewed to define their role and place in the therapy for congestive heart failure.
Why the study?
Does angiotensin receptor blockers improve outcomes in patients with congestive heart failure?
Does angiotensin receptor blockers improve outcomes in patients with congestive heart failure?
This review evaluates the role and place of angiotensin receptor blockers in the therapeutic management of congestive heart failure.
ARBs' role in HF therapy needs clarification; review leaves open optimal integration pending further outcome trials.
Heart failure results in neurohormonal activation of which the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAS) is the main mediator. Activation of this system leads to the production of angiotensin II (ATII), which leads to multiple adverse short-term and long-term effects, including hemodynamic dysfunction, renal dysfunction, inflammation, and cardiac remodeling. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) exert favorable effects in congestive heart failure (CHF) by inhibiting the production of ATII. It has been shown that ACEIs may not be able to suppress the production of ATII completely because there are RAS-independent mechanisms of ATII production. Hence, it was thought that angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) might be more useful in CHF because they directly block the ATII receptors. Many studies have been done to evaluate the role of ARBs in CHF. We reviewed these studies and have attempted to define the place and ARBs in the therapy for CHF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhatia et al. (2005) conducted a review in Congestive Heart Failure. Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARBs) was evaluated. Angiotensin receptor blockers were reviewed to define their role and place in the therapy for congestive heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: