Why the study?
Does sustained arterial hypertension compared to transient arterial hypertension alter the end-systolic pressure-diameter relation in a canine model?
Does sustained arterial hypertension compared to transient arterial hypertension alter the end-systolic pressure-diameter relation in a canine model?
Sustained pressure elevations result in higher left ventricular end-systolic pressure-diameter relation values than transient elevations, highlighting the role of time-dependent activation of myocardial contractility.
Sustained hypertension may enhance time-dependent LV contractility in canine models; hypothesis-generating and leaves open human translation.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of transient and sustained variations in cardiac load on the values of the end-systolic pressure-diameter relation (ESPDR) of the left ventricle. METHODS: We studied 13 dogs under general anesthesia and autonomic blockade. Variations of cardiac loads were done by elevation of blood pressure by mechanical constriction of the aorta. Two protocols were used in each animal: gradual peaking and decreasing pressure variation, the "transient arterial hypertension protocol" (TAH), and a quick and 10 min sustained elevation, the "sustained arterial hypertension protocol"(SAH). Then, we compared the ESDR in these two situations. RESULTS: Acute elevation of arterial pressure, being it "transitory" or "sustained", did not alter the heart frequency and increased similarly the preload and after load. However, they acted differently in end systolic pressure-diameter relation. It was greater in the SAH than TAH protocol, 21.0+/-7.3 mm Hg/mm vs. 9.2+/-1. 2 mm Hg/mm (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The left ventricular ESPDR values determined during sustained pressure elevations were higher than those found during transient pressure elevations. The time-dependent activation of myocardial contractility associated with the Frank-Starling mechanism is the major factor in inotropic stimulation during sustained elevations of blood pressure, determining an increase in the ESPDR values.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bregagnollo et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: