Why the study?
Can stroke volume be reliably calculated from pulmonary artery pressure curves compared to aortic pressure curves?
Can stroke volume be reliably calculated from pulmonary artery pressure curves compared to aortic pressure curves?
Stroke volume can be reliably assessed from pulmonary artery pressure curves, offering a potentially safer alternative to aortic pressure curve recordings in critically ill patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support stroke volume estimation from pulmonary artery curves in critical care; leaves open prospective validation before adoption.
The reliability of five equations in assessing stroke volume from pulmonary artery pressure curves were critically evaluated in six dogs and in six patients. To alter stroke volume, isoproterenol, dobutamine, propranolol, lactate Ringer solution and artificial pacing were employed in the animal study and diltiazem (a calcium blocker) in the human study. A good correlation was found between the calculated and measured stroke volume (r = 0.80-0.86 in the animal study and r = 0.94-0.96 in the human study). The assessment of stroke volume from the pulmonary arterial pressure curves using equations was as good as that from the aortic pressure curves calculated simultaneously. These results suggest that the five equations may be clinically applicable for assessing stroke volume in critically ill patients. The employment of pulmonary arterial pressure curves in assessing stroke volume may be more useful clinically since its recording can be carried out more safely than recordings of aortic pressure curves.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tajimi et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: