Why the study?
EV-ICD implantation fails in 3.1-5.4% of patients primarily due to inadequate R-wave amplitude sensing and failed DFT testing, with intraoperative repositioning needed in at least 20% of successful cases.
Does delayed reassessment improve successful EV-ICD implantation in patients with transient R-wave amplitude attenuation due to air entrapment?
Does delayed reassessment improve successful EV-ICD implantation in patients with transient R-wave amplitude attenuation due to air entrapment?
Delayed reassessment may serve as a potential bail-out strategy for transient R-wave amplitude attenuation caused by air entrapment during EV-ICD implantation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet change EV-ICD implantation practice; leaves open whether delayed reassessment reliably rescues air entrapment effects.
The extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (EV-ICD) offers ventricular tachycardia termination by delivering anti-tachycardia pacing followed by defibrillation therapy, without the risks of transvenous systems.1,2 In the previous studies, EV-ICD implantation was unsuccessful in 3.1–5.4% of patients despite attempted implantation, primarily due to inadequate R-wave amplitude sensing and failed defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing.1,3 Even among successful implantations, intraoperative system repositioning was necessary in at least 20% of cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yanase et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: