Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
February 1, 1995Journal of Endovascular Therapy

All 4 lesions were successfully dilated with no complications, and no restenosis was observed at any treatment site over 18 to 24 months of follow-up.

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Does intraoperative balloon angioplasty safely treat restenosis in patients with recurrent disease after carotid endarterectomy?

Population

3 patients with >80% restenotic lesions at the distal aspect of a previous carotid endarterectomy.

Design

Case_series

Follow-up

18 to 24 months

Authors

CPCarlo PratesiGCGiovanni CrediRPRaffaele Pulli

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Suggests safety for inaccessible post-CEA restenosis; leaves open need for prospective trials before wider use.

Structured PICO

Does intraoperative balloon angioplasty safely treat restenosis in patients with recurrent disease after carotid endarterectomy?

P
Population
3 patients (2 males, 1 female; ages 53 to 70 years) with >80% restenotic lesions (bilateral in one patient) at the distal aspect of a previous carotid endarterectomy.
I
Intervention
Intraoperative balloon angioplasty through open access to the common carotid artery under fluoroscopic guidance with monitoring of evoked potentials.
O
Outcome
Immediate and long-term outcome (restenosis and complications) assessed by ultrasound imaging and arteriography.surrogate

Intraoperative balloon angioplasty may be a safe and effective option for treating surgically inaccessible restenotic carotid lesions with low embolic potential.

Limitations

  • Small sample size requiring more experience before widespread application

Cite This Study

Pratesi et al. (1995) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a71e40226770c2b8de1441dhttps://doi.org/10.1177/152660289500200106
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share