Why the study?
Does cardiovascular autonomic reflex testing accurately detect cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy compared to cardiac 123I-MIBG imaging in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus without cardiovascular risk factors?
Does cardiovascular autonomic reflex testing accurately detect cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy compared to cardiac 123I-MIBG imaging in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus without cardiovascular risk factors?
In patients with T1DM without cardiovascular risk factors, using ≥2 abnormal cardiovascular autonomic reflex tests is highly sensitive but has limited specificity for detecting autonomic dysfunction compared to cardiac 123I-MIBG imaging.
CARTs show limited specificity for CAN versus MIBG in T1DM; leaves open whether scintigraphy adds value beyond standard testing.
AIM: I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-nine patients (29 males, mean age 36 ± 10 years, mean T1DM duration 19 ± 6 years) without cardiovascular risk factors were prospectively enrolled. Participants were evaluated for autonomic dysfunction by assessing the mean circular resultant (MCR), Valsalva maneuver (Vals), postural index (PI), and orthostatic hypotension (OH). Within one month from the performance of these tests, patients underwent cardiac MIBG imaging and the ratio of the heart to upper mediastinum count density (H/M) at 4 hours postinjection was calculated (abnormal values, H/M < 1.80). RESULTS: = 0.456). MCR, PI, Vals, and OH were abnormal in 29 (59%), 8 (16%), 5 (10%), and 11 (22%) patients, respectively. When using H/M_4 < 1.80 as the reference standard, a cutoff point of ≥2 abnormal CARTs had a sensitivity of 100% but a specificity of only 33% for determining CAN. CONCLUSIONS: I-MIBG measurements, which can detect autonomic dysfunction more efficiently than the former. In comparison to semiquantitative cardiac MIBG assessment, the recommended threshold of ≥2 abnormal CARTs to define cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction is highly sensitive but of limited specificity and is independently determined by the duration of T1DM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Didangelos et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: