Why the study?
Does beta adrenergic blockade with timolol reduce myocardial infarct size beyond the effect of heart rate reduction alone in a feline model of coronary occlusion?
Does beta adrenergic blockade with timolol reduce myocardial infarct size beyond the effect of heart rate reduction alone in a feline model of coronary occlusion?
Beta-blockade reduces myocardial infarct size through mechanisms beyond just heart rate reduction and decreased oxygen demand.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Beta-blockade may limit infarct size beyond rate reduction in feline models; leaves open translation to human MI.
Equal reductions in heart rate (44 beats X min-1) were obtained in cats by treatment with either the beta blocking agent timolol or alinidine, an agent claimed to cause bradycardia without interfering with beta adrenoceptor function. Infarct size was measured by staining with triphenyltetrazolium-chloride after 5 h of coronary occlusion and related to the area of hypoperfused myocardium as measured by autoradiography. Regional myocardial blood flow was measured by 15 micron radiolabelled microspheres. Compared with the control cats, in whom 87.4 (SEM 2.2)% of hypoperfused myocardium developed into necrosis, timolol reduced infarct size to 65.8 (SEM 2.6)% (p less than 0.001) and alinidine to 76.2 (SEM 3.1)% (p less than 0.01) of the hypoperfused area. Timolol reduced infarct size more than did alinidine (p less than 0.01). Necrosis was more extensive in the endocardium than in the epicardium in all groups. In the subendocardium timolol and alinidine reduced infarct size to the same extent, whereas timolol reduced infarct size more than alinidine in the subepicardium. Although heart rate proved to be the dominant haemodynamic predictor of infarct size, this study indicates that mechanisms other than reduced oxygen demand associated with bradycardia and cardiodepression are operating in the ischaemic myocardium during beta adrenergic blockade.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
STANGELAND et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: