Why the study?
Culprit lesions underlying coronary thrombi display diverse morphological characteristics including intact fibrous cap, but the clinical significance of intact fibrous cap in relation to lipid-rich plaque presence remains unclear.
Does the absence of lipid-rich plaque underneath intact fibrous cap plaque predict a lower risk of MACEs in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Does the absence of lipid-rich plaque underneath intact fibrous cap plaque predict a lower risk of MACEs in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
The absence of lipid-rich plaque underneath an intact fibrous cap in ACS culprit lesions assessed by OCT is an independent predictor of a lower risk of future major adverse cardiac events.
IFC without underlying LRP may identify lower-risk ACS patients; leaves open whether OCT plaque characterization refines secondary prevention.
Background Although most coronary thromboses occur on the surface of lipid-rich plaque ( LRP ) with plaque rupture ( PR ), previous pathological and optical coherence tomography studies demonstrated diversity in the morphological characteristics of culprit plaque underlying the thrombus, including lesions with intact fibrous cap ( IFC ). We investigated the clinical significance of IFC in relation to the presence or absence of LRP observed via optical coherence tomography in culprit lesions of acute coronary syndrome. Methods and Results We investigated 510 patients with acute coronary syndrome who underwent optical coherence tomography for the culprit lesion. Optical coherence tomography analysis included the presence or absence of PR , which were categorized into the PR group and the IFC group, respectively. The IFC group was further categorized on the basis of the presence of LRP . Incidence of major adverse cardiac events ( MACEs ), including cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and clinically driven remote revascularizations, was compared. Culprit lesions were categorized into 328 PR s and 182 IFC s. MACEs occurred in 85 patients (16.7%) during the median follow-up duration of 621 days. LRP was detected in 325 lesions (99%) with PR , whereas 60 (33.0%) of the lesions with IFC did not show LRP . Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significantly lower MACEs in the IFC group compared with the PR group. Furthermore, the IFC group without LRP showed significantly lower MACEs compared with the IFC group with LRP . Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis demonstrated that IFC without LRP was an independent predictor of better prognosis. Conclusions Exclusion of LRP underneath IFC culprit lesions in acute coronary syndrome may predict a lower risk of future MACEs .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoshino et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: