Why the study?
Does a biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent reduce cardiac mortality compared to a permanent polymer sirolimus-eluting stent in patients with a high SYNTAX score undergoing PCI?
Does a biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent reduce cardiac mortality compared to a permanent polymer sirolimus-eluting stent in patients with a high SYNTAX score undergoing PCI?
In patients with complex coronary anatomy (high SYNTAX score) undergoing PCI, a biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent is associated with decreased 2-year cardiac mortality compared to a permanent polymer sirolimus-eluting stent.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support biolimus-eluting stents in high-SYNTAX PCI; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: The SYNTAX score (SXscore) has been shown to be an effective predictor of clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS AND RESULTS: The SXscore was prospectively collected in 1,397 of the 1,707 patients enrolled in the "all-comers" LEADERS trial (patients post-surgical revascularisation were excluded). Post hoc analysis was performed by stratifying clinical outcomes at two-year follow-up, according to one of three SXscore tertiles: SXlow ≤8 (n=464), 8<SXmid ≤16 (n=472) and SXhigh >16 (n=461). At two-year follow-up the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events was 18.4%, 12.0% and 9.4% in the SXhigh, SXmid, and SXlow tertile, respectively (HR 1.45; CI 1.21-1.74; p<0.01). There was a significantly higher rate of cardiac death in patients in the highest SXscore tertile (7% SXhigh versus 2.4% SXmid versus 1.8% SXlow; HR 2.22; CI 1.5-3.27; p<0.001). Within the SXhigh tertile the rate of cardiac death was significantly lower in patients treated with the biolimus-eluting stent compared with the sirolimus-eluting stent (4.7% versus 9.6%, HR 0.48; CI 0.23-0.99; p=0.046). CONCLUSIONS: The SXscore when applied to an "all-comers" patient population allows for prospective risk stratification of patients undergoing PCI up to two years follow-up. In addition, the SXscore appears to separate the performance of devices in high risk patient groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wykrzykowska et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: