Why the study?
How do different rate-responsive pacemakers respond to external vibration interference in vitro?
How do different rate-responsive pacemakers respond to external vibration interference in vitro?
Accelerometer-based pacemakers may be less susceptible to environmental high-frequency vibration interference and more responsive to physiological low-frequency activity compared to piezoelectric crystal pacemakers.
Accelerometer-based sensors may reduce inappropriate rate responses to environmental vibration; hypothesis-generating and requires human validation before practice change.
The change of the pacing rate in response to external vibration interference was assessed in four rate responsive pacemakers with a piezoelectric crystal (Medtronic Activitrax 8403, Siemens Sensolog 3, Biotronik Ergos 01, and Medtronic Legend 8417) and one with an accelerometer (CPI Excel VR 1119). They were tested in the laboratory. External vibration was simulated in vitro by exposing the different pacemakers to a controlled sinusoidal vibration force generated by a Millar pressure vibration amplifier type MGM-30 (Millar Instruments, Inc., Houston, TX, USA). All pacemakers were programmed at standard settings. Two types of vibration forces were applied: (1) one with varying amplitude but with constant vibration frequency; and (2) one with varying frequency but with constant vibration amplitude. In this manner curves of pacing rate versus vibration forces versus vibration frequency were obtained. High vibration forces and low vibration frequencies were associated with the highest pacing rate response. In this experimental setting, the pacemaker based on the accelerometer principle apparently was the least sensitive to high frequency vibrations, which are known to be related to environmental interference. It also seemed more appropriately responsive in the lower frequency range, which is more appropriate for the detection of true physiological activity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Snoeck et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: