Key result
Multiple-dimension pulse mapping detected arterial waveform changes during local cold stimulation with 17% higher sensitivity than standard pulse wave analysis.
Why the study?
Does multiple-dimension pulse mapping (MDPM) provide higher sensitivity than pulse wave analysis (PWA) for detecting arterial waveform changes induced by cold stimulation in healthy subjects?
Does multiple-dimension pulse mapping (MDPM) provide higher sensitivity than pulse wave analysis (PWA) for detecting arterial waveform changes induced by cold stimulation in healthy subjects?
Effect estimate: 17% higher sensitivity
Multiple-dimension pulse mapping provides a highly sensitive, visible image of arterial waveform changes, potentially improving the early non-invasive detection of arterial stiffness.
May aid vascular reactivity research; leaves open clinical utility pending validation.
Arterial stiffness is an early marker of cardiovascular disease. Nowadays, non-invasive tests are widely utilized in clinical diagnosis and play an important role in early detection. Pulse wave analysis (PWA) is typically used as a way to investigate arterial risk factors, measuring radial pulse waveforms with single-point sensors. The three-dimensional pulse mapping (3DPM) made by array radial pulse waves can expose holistic health states. It is interesting to see the difference between 3DPM and PWA in arterial waveform changes. This paper uses a multiple-point bi-sensing pulse diagnosis instrument to get radial pulse data, then constructs multiple-dimension pulse mapping (MDPM), including 3DPM and dynamic 2DPM. The 30 healthy subjects were studied by being given local cold stimulation on the left radial artery to induced anomalous pulse waveform. Pulse data were measured at three stages: base, cold, and recovery. The augmentation index and H3/H1 were significantly higher (P <; 0.01 ) at cold than base. In MDPM analysis, both diameters (longitudinal and transverse) were significantly higher (P <; 0.001 ) in cold. In comparison, MDPM indexes increased 17% sensitivity higher than PWA. Furthermore, MDPM provides an immediately visible image of arterial waveform changes. This paper provides an automatic abnormal arterial waveform measurement system to reconstruct a visible image that could easily analyze diverse levels of arterial waveform changes, with more sensitivity than those from PWA. Thus, it is suggested that this efficient approach has a potential application to assess vascular wall variables, particularly to increase early detection of abnormal arterial waveforms, due to its high sensitivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Su et al. (2016) studied Healthy subjects (n=30). Multiple-dimension pulse mapping (MDPM) vs. Pulse wave analysis (PWA) was evaluated on Sensitivity for detecting arterial waveform changes (17% higher sensitivity). Multiple-dimension pulse mapping detected arterial waveform changes during local cold stimulation with 17% higher sensitivity than standard pulse wave analysis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: