Why the study?
Does nicardipine compared to verapamil alter the forearm vascular response to exogenous norepinephrine in patients with uncomplicated hypertension?
Does nicardipine compared to verapamil alter the forearm vascular response to exogenous norepinephrine in patients with uncomplicated hypertension?
Nicardipine, but not verapamil, exhibits functional alpha-antagonism, highlighting the heterogeneity of calcium channel blockers in humans.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Nicardipine may exert functional alpha-antagonism in hypertension; leaves open differential CCB effects on vascular responses.
The interference by two unrelated calcium entry blockers, nicardipine and verapamil, with the forearm vascular response to graded exogenous norepinephrine was evaluated in two groups (n = 6 each) of patients with uncomplicated hypertension. Drugs were infused into the brachial artery at systemically ineffective rates and forearm blood flow was measured by venous plethysmography. Nicardipine (1 microgram/dl forearm tissue/min) relaxed forearm arterioles and antagonized the vasoconstrictor effect of norepinephrine, whereas verapamil (1 microgram/dl forearm tissue/min) was ineffective, although vasodilating to a comparable extent. Therefore, functional alpha-antagonism may contribute to the vasodilating and, possibly, the antihypertensive effect of nicardipine but, apparently, not verapamil. The data further stress the heterogeneity of calcium channel entry blockers even in human beings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pedrinelli et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: