Due to significant adaptational changes in sarcomere and sarcolemma proteins during cardiac hypertrophy, screening for new inotropic agents must be performed on hypertrophied rather than normal tissue.
May require inotrope screening on hypertrophied tissue; leaves open clinical translation pending prospective validation.
In response to increasing demand, the cardiac muscle has developed several adaptational mechanisms. Gene expression is modified in a quantitative and a qualitative way since the heart hypertrophies and since its structure changes to improve the efficiency of the contraction. The sarcomere modifications are both species-and tissue-specific. An isoenzymic shift of myosin from high adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase) activity form V-1 to low activity form V-3 occurs in all conditions in which V-1 is initially predominant, i.e., in rat (and also rabbit) ventricles and the atria of other species, including humans. It was not observed in conditions in which V-3 was predominant, as in human ventricles (and also in those of cats and pigs). Another shift from creatine kinase (CK) monomer M to CK B, the form that predominates in the fetal heart, is also observed. The sarcolemma is also modified, at least in rats. The digitalis receptor was characterized by studying the inotropic effect of the drug on an isolated heart preparation and on a purified preparation of sarcolemma with a high Na+, K+-ATPase activity by binding [3H]ouabain and ouabain-induced inhibition of the enzymatic activity. In hypertrophied heart, both the recovery of normal contractility after ouabain infusion and the release of previously bound ouabain were slowed, as for fetal hearts. Changes in other inotropic receptors have also been reported. From a practical point of view, this means that screening of new inotropic agents has to be done on hypertrophied hearts and not, as usual, on normal tissue.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Swynghedauw et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: