Why the study?
Does hypercholesterolemia increase macrophage infiltration after balloon injury in rabbit iliac arteries?
Does hypercholesterolemia increase macrophage infiltration after balloon injury in rabbit iliac arteries?
In vivo hypercholesterolemia enhances macrophage infiltration following vascular injury via increased NF-kappaB activation and ICAM-1 expression.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports hypercholesterolemia-driven post-injury inflammation in rabbits; leaves open relevance to human restenosis or therapy.
Both hypercholesterolemia and vascular injury have been reported to induce macrophage infiltration, but their combined effect and the mechanism by which hypercholesterolemia enhances the infiltration remain to be clarified in vivo. To evaluate the effect of hypercholesterolemia on macrophage infiltration after vascular injury, the iliac arteries of hypercholesterolemic (HC) and normocholesterolemic (NC) rabbits were examined 2h, 1 day, 3 days, 7 days, and 14 days after balloon injury using immunohistochemical staining for macrophages, intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1, and vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1. Nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-kappaB) activation was also evaluated in fresh frozen iliac arteries using the electrophoretic mobility shift assay method. The fundamental difference between HC and NC was the amount of macrophage infiltration seen in HC from 7 days after balloon injury. Two out of 4 HC iliac arteries on the 7th day, and 3 out of 4 HC iliac arteries on the 14th day were positively stained with ICAM-1 in regenerated endothelium and neointima, whereas there were no positively stained NC iliac arteries. Neither HC nor NC tissues showed positive staining with VCAM-1. NF-kappaB was activated in HC 7 and 14 days after balloon injury, but not in NC. In conclusion, in vivo hypercholesterolemia induces macrophage infiltration after balloon injury and it is mediated by increased NF-kappaB activation promoting ICAM-1 expression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: