Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reveals that volume overload causes severe left ventricular dysfunction and reduced coronary flow compared to pressure overload in dogs, highlighting distinct physiological impacts.
Myocardial function, flow and O2 consumption were compared in cardiac hypertrophy induced by pressure-loading (P) and by volume overloading (V). Increases in LV-to-body weight ratios in P and V hypertrophied hearts were comparable. Indices of LV function such as cardiac output, stroke volume, stroke work, minute work, peak LV dP/dt, ratio of peak LV dP/dt-to-isovolumic pressure and -to-LVEDP, and Vmax were significantly reduced from normal only in hypertrophy induced by V. Left ventricular coronary flow was reduced from 167.1 +/- 27.2 in normal dogs to 146.2 +/- 17.1 cm3/min-100 g-1 in P hypertrophy, and was reduced further to 82.5 +/- 8.2 cm3/min-100 g-1 in V hypertrophy. Flows decreased similarly in epicardium and endocardium in both hypertrophied hearts. Cardiac O2 extraction in P and V hearts was greater than in control hearts. Myocardial O2 consumption was maintained at control values in P hypertrophy, and decreased by 54 +/- 3% in V hypertrophy. These findings indicate that LV function is impaired at rest in hypertrophy induced by V and is normal in hypertrophy induced by P.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Malik et al. (1977) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: