Alpha-adrenergic prolongation of repolarization in canine epicardium is mediated by reduction of I(Ks) rather than inhibition of I(to), highlighting regional differences in ionic mechanisms.
Should not change clinical alpha-agonist use; leaves open species-specific I(Ks) mediation of epicardial repolarization for further study.
INTRODUCTION: In canine ventricle, alpha-adrenergic agonists prolong action potential duration (APD) without any effect on the action potential notch, suggesting that, in this species, the effect on repolarization might be independent of inhibition of I(to). The present study investigated the action of the alpha-adrenergic agonist phenylephrine on the action potential and the repolarizing currents I(to) and I(K) in isolated canine epicardial myocytes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Isolated cells from canine epicardial tissue, and Purkinje fibers, were studied with the whole cell, voltage clamp method. Phenylephrine 0.1 microM increased APD by 13% +/- 4% at 90% repolarization without affecting the notch or amplitude. Under voltage clamp, concentrations of phenylephrine as high as 10 microM had no effect on I(to) in canine epicardial myocytes. However, I(to) of isolated canine Purkinje myocytes was reduced to 69% +/- 7% of control by 1 microM phenylephrine. Further studies in canine epicardial myocytes revealed an action of phenylephrine to inhibit I(K), and in particular I(Ks). Using a voltage protocol that included a two-step repolarization to separate I(Ks) and I(Kr) tail components, the largely I(Kr) component was not significantly affected by 1 microM phenylephrine, whereas the largely I(Ks) component was reduced to 81% +/- 5% of control value. CONCLUSION: Alpha-adrenergic prolongation of repolarization in canine epicardium does not result from inhibition of I(to). Rather, it appears that reduction of I(Ks) contributes to the action of phenylephrine. The unresponsiveness of epicardial I(to) is not a general characteristic of the canine heart, because Purkinje myocyte I(to) was inhibited, suggesting regional differences in the molecular basis of I(to) and/or alpha-adrenergic signaling in the canine heart.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robinson et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: