Why the study?
Is the ACE intron 16 I/D genotype associated with elevated CRP levels in pregnant women with uteroplacental dysfunction?
Is the ACE intron 16 I/D genotype associated with elevated CRP levels in pregnant women with uteroplacental dysfunction?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The ACE I/D genotype is associated with elevated CRP levels during pregnancies complicated by disturbed uteroplacental circulation, suggesting a potential link to preeclampsia pathogenesis.
INTRODUCTION: Disturbance of the uteroplacental circulation (UPC) and the renin-angiotensin system are involved in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. In women with history of preeclampsia persistently elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels have been described. The angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) intron 16 insertion/deletion (I/D) genotype is associated with ACE activity and assumed to be a risk factor for preeclampsia. As ACE generates proinflammatory angiotensin II, we analysed, whether ACE intron 16 I/D genotype is associated with CRP and whether this association exhibited a relation to uteroplacental dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 639 women have been followed during pregnancy with repeated measurements of CRP levels (observations: n=2333). ACE intron 16 I/D genotype was determined, and its association with CRP was assessed with adjustment for non-independent observations. RESULTS: CRP levels of ACE D allele carriers were significantly higher than those of the ACE II (wild-type) genotype (p=0.0003, p(adj)=0.04). This relation was allele-dose dependent (p<10(-4), p(adj)<0.02). Association between ACE I/D and CRP was significantly restricted to patients presenting with impaired UPC in univariate (p<0.04) and multivariate analyses (p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The ACE I/D genotype is significantly associated with CRP elevations during pregnancies complicated by disturbed UPC. Whether this effect on CRP is involved in pathogenesis of preeclampsia has to be elucidated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Häupl et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: