Key result
Maximum carotid plaque thickness and mean common carotid intima-media thickness independently predicted combined vascular events (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.47-2.67 and HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.23-2.29, respectively).
Why the study?
Does the measurement of carotid plaque thickness and common carotid IMT improve the prediction of combined vascular events in a European cohort?
Population
3,703 participants in the IMPROVE-study (European cohort)
Comparison
Top quartile of carotid plaque thickness and… vs Bottom 1-3 quartiles of cIMT max and PF CC-IMT…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
36.2 months
Authors
Loading...
May refine VE risk stratification with complementary carotid measures; leaves open incremental value beyond standard scores.
Cohort (n=3,703)
Yes
Does the measurement of carotid plaque thickness and common carotid IMT improve the prediction of combined vascular events in a European cohort?
Hazard Ratio: 1.98 (95% CI 1.47–2.67)
Carotid plaque thickness and common carotid IMT provide independent and additive value for cardiovascular risk prediction and reclassification beyond traditional risk factors.
Amato et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular risk (n=3,703). Top quartile of maximum carotid plaque thickness (cIMT max) vs. 1-3 quartiles of cIMT max was evaluated on Combined vascular events (VEs) (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.47-2.67). Maximum carotid plaque thickness and mean common carotid intima-media thickness independently predicted combined vascular events (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.47-2.67 and HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.23-2.29, respectively).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: