Key result
Combined oral contraceptive use and pregnancy independently increased VTE risk, with adjusted hazard ratios of 2.2 and 16.0 respectively.
Why the study?
Does combined oral contraceptive use or pregnancy increase the risk of venous thromboembolism in women with factor V Leiden or prothrombin mutations?
Cohort (n=798)
Does combined oral contraceptive use or pregnancy increase the risk of venous thromboembolism in women with factor V Leiden or prothrombin mutations?
Pregnancy poses a substantially higher risk of VTE than combined oral contraceptive use in women with factor V Leiden or prothrombin mutations, suggesting COCs should not be strictly contraindicated.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pregnancy linked to far higher VTE risk than COC use in thrombophilia; leaves open whether COCs merit strict contraindication in this group.
Current guidelines discourage combined oral contraceptive (COC) use in women with hereditary thrombophilic defects. However, qualifying all hereditary thrombophilic defects as similarly strong risk factors might be questioned. Recent studies indicate the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) of a factor V Leiden mutation as considerably lower than a deficiency of protein C, protein S, or antithrombin. In a retrospective family cohort, the VTE risk during COC use and pregnancy (including postpartum) was assessed in 798 female relatives with or without a heterozygous, double heterozygous, or homozygous factor V Leiden or prothrombin G20210A mutation. Overall, absolute VTE risk in women with no, single, or combined defects was 0.13 (95% confidence interval 0.08-0.21), 0.35 (0.22-0.53), and 0.94 (0.47-1.67) per 100 person-years, while these were 0.19 (0.07-0.41), 0.49 (0.18-1.07), and 0.86 (0.10-3.11) during COC use, and 0.73 (0.30-1.51), 1.97 (0.94-3.63), and 7.65 (3.08-15.76) during pregnancy. COC use and pregnancy were independent risk factors for VTE, with highest risk during pregnancy postpartum, as demonstrated by adjusted hazard ratios of 16.0 (8.0-32.2) versus 2.2 (1.1-4.0) during COC use. Rather than strictly contraindicating COC use, we advocate that detailed counseling on all contraceptive options, including COCs, addressing the associated risks of both VTE and unintended pregnancy, enabling these women to make an informed choice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vlijmen et al. (2011) conducted a cohort in Hereditary thrombophilic defects (factor V Leiden or prothrombin mutation) (n=798). Combined oral contraceptive (COC) use vs. No COC use was evaluated on Venous thromboembolism (VTE) (HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1-4.0). Combined oral contraceptive use and pregnancy independently increased VTE risk, with adjusted hazard ratios of 2.2 and 16.0 respectively.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: