Key result
The modified technique of supracoronary myotomy showed no clinical advantages or disadvantages compared to the standard technique at 6 months, with both groups showing satisfactory results.
Why the study?
To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of standard versus modified supracoronary myotomy techniques in the postoperative period.
Does a modified technique of supracoronary myotomy improve clinical efficacy and safety compared to the standard technique in patients with isolated myocardial bridge of the coronary artery?
Cohort (n=47)
Does a modified technique of supracoronary myotomy improve clinical efficacy and safety compared to the standard technique in patients with isolated myocardial bridge of the coronary artery?
A modified supracoronary myotomy technique for myocardial bridging showed similar satisfactory clinical and angiographic outcomes at 6 months compared to the standard technique.
Modified myotomy may improve outcomes in myocardial bridging; hypothesis-generating, needs prospective trials before practice change.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Исмаил-заде et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Isolated myocardial bridge of the coronary artery (n=47). Modified technique of supracoronary myotomy vs. Standard technique of supracoronary myotomy was evaluated on Clinical efficacy and safety in the postoperative period. The modified technique of supracoronary myotomy showed no clinical advantages or disadvantages compared to the standard technique at 6 months, with both groups showing satisfactory results.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: