Why the study?
Heart failure GDMT utilization to target doses is suboptimal, with adverse effects, physiological factors, and therapeutic inertia cited as potential contributors.
Nearly 60% of heart failure patients in a specialized GDMT optimization program experience adverse effects that limit titration, emphasizing the need for standardized management strategies.
Tolerability data from specialized HF programs are hypothesis-generating; prospective studies needed before informing broader GDMT titration.
BACKGROUND: Utilization of heart failure (HF) guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) to target doses is suboptimal, with studies citing adverse effects (AEs), physiological factors, and therapeutic inertia as potential contributing factors. The objective of our study was to explore tolerability and GDMT titration-limiting AEs in a specialized heart failure optimization program implemented at our institution. METHODS: We studied the baseline characteristics of 254 patients who successfully completed our program and analyzed the frequency and severity of the four most common GDMT-related AEs: hypotension, bradycardia, hyperkalemia, and renal dysfunction. RESULTS: Patients who achieved target doses were younger, more likely to have nonischemic HF, less likely to have a recent HF-related hospitalization, had less coronary artery disease, and were more likely to be obese. Multivariate analyses revealed significant associations between beta blocker suboptimal dosing (< 50% of target dose) and older age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0-1.07; p = 0.031), presence of atrial fibrillation (OR: 2.57; 95% CI: 1.18-5.58; p = 0.017), and absence of hypertension (OR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.17-0.89; p = 0.025). For angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers/angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors, suboptimal dosing was associated with the presence of atrial fibrillation (OR: 2.08; 95% CI: 1.04-4.17; p = 0.039). Of the patients who completed the program, 59.1% encountered at least one AE that hindered the titration to target GDMT doses. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the complexities of GDMT optimization within a specialized program and the need for standardized definitions of GDMT-related AEs and management strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Velasco et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: