Why the study?
Does beta-adrenergic stimulation with isoprenaline decrease myocardial stiffness in normal and failing rabbit hearts?
Does beta-adrenergic stimulation with isoprenaline decrease myocardial stiffness in normal and failing rabbit hearts?
Beta-adrenergic stimulation acutely decreases myocardial stiffness via beta1/beta2-adrenoceptors and PKA, an effect that is blunted in doxorubicin-induced heart failure.
Blunted isoprenaline effect on stiffness in DOXO-HF models; hypothesis-generating for beta-adrenergic lusitropy as a therapeutic target in human HF.
The acute effects of beta-adrenergic stimulation on myocardial stiffness were evaluated. New-Zealand white rabbits were treated with saline (control group) or doxorubicin to induce heart failure (HF) (DOXO-HF group). Effects of isoprenaline (10(-10)-10(-5) M), a non-selective beta-adrenergic agonist, were tested in papillary muscles from both groups. In the control group, the effects of isoprenaline were also evaluated in the presence of a damaged endocardial endothelium, atenolol (beta(1)-adrenoceptor antagonist), ICI-118551 (beta(2)-adrenoceptor antagonist), KT-5720 (PKA inhibitor), L-NNA (NO-synthase inhibitor), or indomethacin (cyclooxygenase inhibitor). Passive length-tension relations were constructed before and after adding isoprenaline (10(-5) M). In the control group, isoprenaline increased resting muscle length up to 1.017+/-0.006 L/L(max). Correction of resting muscle length to its initial value resulted in a 28.5+/-3.1 % decrease of resting tension, indicating decreased muscle stiffness, as confirmed by the isoprenaline-induced right-downward shift of the passive length-tension relation. These effects were modulated by beta(1)- and beta(2)-adrenoceptors and PKA. In DOXO-HF group, the effect on myocardial stiffness was significantly decreased. We conclude that beta-adrenergic stimulation is a relevant mechanism of acute neurohumoral modulation of the diastolic function. Furthermore, this study clarifies the mechanisms by which myocardial stiffness is decreased.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Falcão‐Pires et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: