Why the study?
Does transcatheter aortic valve implantation improve cardiac sympathetic nerve activity in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis?
Does transcatheter aortic valve implantation improve cardiac sympathetic nerve activity in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis?
TAVI immediately improves cardiac sympathetic nerve activity in patients with severe aortic stenosis, suggesting that AS hemodynamics directly enhance sympathetic activation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
TAVI-associated sympathetic improvement in severe AS may reflect hemodynamic relief; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective confirmation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: There is a consensus that overactivation of the cardiac sympathetic nervous system (CSN) proportionately increases the severity of heart failure and is accompanied by worse prognosis. Because it is unknown whether patients with aortic valve stenosis (AS) have similar CSN activation, we investigated the effect of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS AND RESULTS: I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) myocardial scintigraphy was performed at baseline and at 2 weeks after TAVI. At baseline, the early heart-mediastinum ratio (H/M) was within normal limits (3.0±0.5), but the delayed H/M was low (2.6±0.6) and the washout rate (WR) was high (34±13%). WR negatively correlated with aortic valve area (r=-0.389, P<0.01) and cardiac output (r=-0.595, P<0.01) and positively correlated with norepinephrine (r=0.519, P<0.01) and log NT-proBNP level (r=0.613, P<0.01). After TAVI, there were significant decreases in the norepinephrine level (366±179 ng/mL vs. 276±125 ng/mL, P<0.01) and WR (34±13 vs. 26±11%, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The WR of MIBG was a useful marker of CSN activity and severity of AS. Immediate improvement of CSN activity after TAVI implied that AS hemodynamics per se enhanced CSN.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sobajima et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: