Why the study?
Does combined therapy with fosinopril and hydrochlorothiazide reduce sitting diastolic blood pressure more than either drug alone or placebo in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension?
Does combined therapy with fosinopril and hydrochlorothiazide reduce sitting diastolic blood pressure more than either drug alone or placebo in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension?
Combination therapy with fosinopril and hydrochlorothiazide is more effective than either monotherapy or placebo in reducing blood pressure in mild to moderate essential hypertension, with a similar safety profile to placebo.
Supports initial fosinopril-HCTZ combination over monotherapy for greater BP reduction; confirms additive efficacy in this RCT for mild-moderate hypertension.
The antihypertensive effect and safety of fosinopril and hydrochlorothiazide combined were compared with each drug singly and placebo in a controlled manner. After a 4- to 5-week placebo lead-in period, 67 mild to moderate essential hypertensive patients (seated diastolic blood pressure > or = 95 and < or = 110 mm Hg) were randomized in a double-blind fashion into four parallel treatment groups: 20 mg fosinopril plus 12.5 mg hydrochlorothiazide, 20 mg fosinopril, 12.5 mg hydrochlorothiazide, and placebo during 8 weeks. Patients were seen biweekly. Sitting diastolic blood pressure was the outcome variable defining therapeutic response. The efficacy of fosinopril plus hydrochlorothiazide as a combined therapy was superior to any single drug (P < .05) and placebo (P < .01) in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension. Mean adjusted systolic/diastolic blood pressure decrements at week 8 were -18.8/-13.7, -12.9/-11.8, -8.5/-9.3, and -2.7/-6.9 mm Hg for the fosinopril plus hydrochlorothiazide, fosinopril, hydrochlorothiazide, and placebo groups, respectively. Clinical adverse events and laboratory changes documented throughout the study were similar to placebo and were mild in severity in all groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fernández et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: