Why the study?
Does epicardial microwave ablation restore sinus rhythm and preserve atrial function in open-heart surgery patients with concomitant atrial fibrillation?
Does epicardial microwave ablation restore sinus rhythm and preserve atrial function in open-heart surgery patients with concomitant atrial fibrillation?
Epicardial microwave ablation during open-heart surgery effectively restores sinus rhythm and preserves atrial mechanical function at 1-year follow-up.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports epicardial microwave ablation for surgical AF; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials before practice change.
OBJECTIVES: To study epicardial microwave ablation of concomitant atrial fibrillation and its effects on heart rhythm and atrial function during follow-up. DESIGN: The study included 20 open-heart surgery patients with concomitant atrial fibrillation. Transthoracic echocardiography with flow and tissue Doppler recordings was performed preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. Blood samples were obtained preoperatively and postoperatively for analysis of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), and amino terminal precursor of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). RESULTS: Fourteen of 19 patients (74%) were in sinus rhythm with no antiarrhythmic drugs at 12 months. All patients in sinus rhythm had preserved left and right atrial-filling waves through atrioventricular valves during atrial contraction. Tissue velocity echocardiography on patients in sinus rhythm showed preserved atrial wall velocities, atrial strain, and atrial strain rate. Levels of natriuretic peptides tended to decrease in patients with stable sinus rhythm at one year compared to patients in atrial fibrillation. CONCLUSIONS: Epicardial microwave ablation results in sinus rhythm in a majority of patients and seems to preserve atrial mechanical function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahlsson et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: