Why the study?
Does intravenous isradipine compared to nifedipine improve systemic hemodynamics with fewer cardiodepressant effects in patients with stable coronary heart disease under autonomic blockade?
Does intravenous isradipine compared to nifedipine improve systemic hemodynamics with fewer cardiodepressant effects in patients with stable coronary heart disease under autonomic blockade?
Isradipine demonstrates greater vasodilating and fewer negative inotropic effects compared to nifedipine in patients with stable coronary heart disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Isradipine may be favored over nifedipine for vasodilation in stable CHD; extends RCT evidence on dihydropyridine hemodynamics under autonomic blockade.
Summary: The cardiodepressant and vasodilator effects of an intravenous (i.v.) infusion of 0.5 mg isradipine or 2 mg nifedipine were interindividually (10 vs. 10 patients) compared in a double-blind study in patients with stable coronary heart disease. To minimize vasodilation-induced autonomic reflex mechanisms, which may counterbalance negative inotropic effects after acute administration of calcium antagonists, i.v. autonomic blockade was produced by 0.2 mg/kg propranolol and 0.04 mg/kg atropine. Systemic hemodynamics were measured before and 15 min after the end of the 15-min calcium antagonist infusion. After administration of both drugs, heart rate (HR) decreased similarly during the observation period (isradipine from 93 ± 10 to 88 ± 9 beats/min and nifedipine from 84 ± 9 to 79 ± 6 beats/min, both p ≤ 0.01). The reduction in total peripheral resistance (TPR) was significantly (p ≤ 0.01) greater after isradipine (from 1,376 ± 285 to 1,002 ± 224 dynes s cm “ s) than after nifedipine (1,258 ± 262 to 1,112 ± 225 dynes s cm-5). Between the two drugs, the difference in the reduction of afterload independent dP/dt40, determined by tip-manometry, reached borderline significance (p = 0.08) (isradipine from 1,197 ± 258 to 1,157 ± 225 mm Hg/s, NS and nifedipine 1,228 ± 226 to 1,109 ± 227 mm Hg/s, p =s 0.01). There was a significant difference (p =s 0.05) in the behavior of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), which increased after nifedipine from 8 ± 5 to 11 ± 4 mm Hg (p =s 0.01) and decreased insignificantly after isradipine from 14 ± 10 to 12 ± 7 mm Hg. These data suggest that isradipine separates, more than nifedipine, vasodilating from negative inotropic effects, and that isradipine has more vasodilator and fewer cardiodepressant effects than nifedipine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burger et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: