Why the study?
Does intraperitoneal preseeding of photo-oxidized bovine pericardial pulmonary valve constructs improve re-cellularization and neomatrix deposition in a sheep model?
Does intraperitoneal preseeding of photo-oxidized bovine pericardial pulmonary valve constructs improve re-cellularization and neomatrix deposition in a sheep model?
Intraperitoneal preseeding of an acellularized cross-linked matrix achieves complete re-cellularization and neomatrix deposition in a sheep model of heart valve tissue engineering.
Hypothesis-generating for IP preseeding in valve tissue engineering; human trials needed before clinical translation.
AIM: To use in vivo instead of in vitro cell seeding in heart valve tissue engineering. METHODS AND RESULTS: Intraperitoneally preseeded, photo-oxidized bovine pericardial pulmonary valve constructs (group 1) were compared with non-preseeded constructs (group 2) implanted in sheep. All valves functioned normally and were macroscopically intact at explantation [1 week (n = 6) and 1 month (n = 6) in each group], except for one thrombosed leaflet in a group-2 valve at 1 month. Almost 10-fold higher neomatrix deposition and doubling of the leaflet thickness were found in group 1 vs. 2 (P < 0.05). A concomitant significant decrease in leaflet length (15%) was found at 1 month in group 1. The total cross-sectional surface and total amount of collagen of the original matrix remained unchanged in both groups at all times. Immunohistochemistry showed a low immune response, stem/progenitor cell infiltration, appropriated differentiation, and spontaneous endothelialization of the valves. Significantly, increased re-cellularization was found after IP preseeding compared with spontaneous seeding: cell coverage of the leaflet was 71-100 vs. 8-26% (P < 0.05), respectively. CONCLUSION: Complete re-cellularization can be obtained by IP preseeding of an acellularized cross-linked matrix. Well-functioning valve constructs show cellularization and differentiation into myofibroblast phenotype and concomitant neomatrix deposition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Visscher et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: