Why the study?
Does the choice of induction agent (thiopentone, etomidate, propofol) with or without fentanyl affect the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation?
Does the choice of induction agent (thiopentone, etomidate, propofol) with or without fentanyl affect the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation?
Propofol is more effective than thiopentone or etomidate at blunting the hypertensive response to tracheal intubation, an effect further enhanced by the addition of fentanyl.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support propofol preference for intubation haemodynamics; leaves open randomized confirmation before practice change.
The haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation was compared in 303 patients in whom anaesthesia was induced with either thiopentone 4 mg/kg, etomidate 0.3 mg/kg or propofol 2.5 mg/kg, with and without fentanyl 2 micrograms/kg. There was after propofol alone a significant decrease in arterial blood pressure, which did not increase above control values after intubation. Significant increases in arterial pressure followed intubation in patients induced with thiopentone or etomidate alone. Increases in heart rate occurred with all agents after laryngoscopy. The use of fentanyl resulted in arterial pressures lower than those after the induction agent alone, and in an attenuation, but not abolition of the responses to laryngoscopy and intubation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harris et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: