Why the study?
Microvascular alterations contribute to organ injury in critical care, and MR-proADM may predict organ damage, prompting evaluation of its correlation with microvascular flow index in infected patients.
Does MR-proADM clearance correlate with microvascular flow index improvement in critically ill patients with infection?
Does MR-proADM clearance correlate with microvascular flow index improvement in critically ill patients with infection?
In critically ill patients with infection, a 24-hour MR-proADM clearance of ≥20% is associated with significant microvascular improvement, supporting its prognostic value.
Supports prognostic value of early MR-proADM clearance for microvascular recovery in infection; leaves open whether monitoring alters management or outcomes.
Introduction: Microvascular alterations are involved in the development of organ injury in critical care patients. Mid-regional proadrenomedullin (MR-proADM) may predict organ damage and its evolution. The main objective of this study was to assess the correlation between MR-proADM and microvascular flow index (MFI) in a small cohort of 20 adult critical care patients diagnosed with infection, sepsis, or septic shock. Further objectives were to evaluate the correlation between the clearance of MR-proADM and the variables of microcirculation and between MR-proADM and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective observational pilot study. Inclusion criteria: consecutive adult patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) for or with infection-related illness. Daily measurement of MR-proADM and calculation of the SOFA score from admission in ICU to day 5. Repeated evaluations of sublingual microcirculation, collection of clinical data, and laboratory tests. Results: Primary outcome: MR-proADM was not significantly correlated to the MFI at admission in ICU. A clearance of MR-proADM of 20% or more in the first 24 h was related to the improvement of the MFIs and MFIt [percentual variation of the MFIs + 12.35 (6.01–14.59)% vs. +2.23 (−4.45–6.01)%, p = 0.005; MFIt +9.09 (4.53–16.26)% vs. −1.43 (−4.36–3.12)%, p = 0.002]. Conclusion: This study did not support a direct correlation of MR-proADM with the MFI at admission in ICU; however, it showed a good correlation between the clearance of MR-proADM, MFI, and other microvascular variables. This study also supported the prognostic value of the marker. Adequately powered studies should be performed to confirm the findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Domizi et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: