Why the study?
Risk stratification in infection commonly relies on the SOFA score, but whether adding MR-proADM improves its predictive value for 30-day mortality in patients presenting to the emergency department was unclear.
Does adding mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM) to the SOFA score improve 30-day mortality prediction in patients with acute infections presenting to the ED?
Does adding mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM) to the SOFA score improve 30-day mortality prediction in patients with acute infections presenting to the ED?
Adding MR-proADM to the SOFA score improves 30-day mortality risk stratification in ED patients with acute infections.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
MR-proADM may refine SOFA mortality prediction in ED infections; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
OBJECTIVES: Risk stratification in patients with infection is usually based on the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment-Score (SOFA score). Our aim was to investigate whether the vasoactive peptide mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM) improves the predictive value of the SOFA score for 30-day mortality in patients with acute infection presenting to the emergency department (ED). METHODS: This secondary analysis of the prospective observational TRIAGE study included 657 patients with infection. The SOFA score, MR-proADM, and traditional inflammation markers were all measured at time of admission. Associations of admission parameters and 30-day mortality were investigated by measures of logistic regression, discrimination analyses, net reclassification index (NRI), and integrated discrimination index (IDI). RESULTS: MR-proADM values were higher in non-survivors compared with survivors (4.5±3.5 nmol/L vs. 1.7 ± 1.8 nmol/L) with an adjusted odds ratio of 26.6 (95% CI 3.92 to 180.61, p=0.001) per 1 nmol/L increase in admission MR-proADM levels and an area under the receiver operator curve (AUC) of 0.86. While the SOFA score alone revealed an AUC of 0.81, adding MR-proADM further improved discrimination (AUC 0.87) and classification within predefined risk categories (NRI 0.075, p-value <0.05). An admission MR-proADM threshold of 1.75 nmol/L provided the best prognostic accuracy for 30-day mortality; with a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 75%, and a negative predictive value of 98%. CONCLUSIONS: MR-proADM improved the mortality risk stratification in patients with infection presenting to the ED beyond SOFA score alone and may further improve initial therapeutic site-of-care decisions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01768494. Registered January 15, 2013.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haag et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: