Key result
A clinical chemistry score of 0 points achieved 100% sensitivity for 30-day myocardial infarction or death, outperforming high-sensitivity cardiac troponin alone for identifying low-risk patients.
Why the study?
Does a clinical chemistry score incorporating hs-cTn, glucose, and eGFR improve risk stratification for 30-day myocardial infarction or death compared to hs-cTn alone in patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected acute coronary syndrome?
Population
4,245 patients presenting to the emergency department with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome…
Comparison
Clinical chemistry score ranging from 0-5… vs High-sensitivity cardiac troponin tests alone.
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
30 days
Authors
Loading...
May aid ED discharge decisions if validated; leaves open need for prospective outcome trials in suspected ACS.
Cohort (n=4,245)
Yes
Does a clinical chemistry score incorporating hs-cTn, glucose, and eGFR improve risk stratification for 30-day myocardial infarction or death compared to hs-cTn alone in patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected acute coronary syndrome?
Absolute Event Rate: 100% vs 96.6%
A simple clinical chemistry score combining hs-cTn, glucose, and eGFR safely and effectively identifies emergency department patients at low and high risk for 30-day MI or death, outperforming hs-cTn alone.
Kavsak et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Suspected acute coronary syndrome (n=4,245). Clinical chemistry score (CCS) vs. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin alone was evaluated on Sensitivity for 30-day myocardial infarction or death (hs-cTnI CCS = 0 vs hs-cTnI < 5 ng/L) (95% CI 99.5-100). A clinical chemistry score of 0 points achieved 100% sensitivity for 30-day myocardial infarction or death, outperforming high-sensitivity cardiac troponin alone for identifying low-risk patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: