Why the study?
The association between ambient circulating environments and ablation lesions had been largely underexplored.
Does the ambient circulating environment surrounding an ablation catheter tip affect ablation lesion characteristics in myocardial models?
Does the ambient circulating environment surrounding an ablation catheter tip affect ablation lesion characteristics in myocardial models?
Higher ambient circulation flow around an ablation catheter tip decreases radiofrequency ablation lesion size, which may impact efficacy and safety in varying flow conditions such as the epicardial space.
Flow may reduce lesion size and affect efficacy/safety; leaves open optimization of ablation in variable cardiac environments.
INTRODUCTION: The association between ambient circulating environments (CEs) and ablation lesions has been largely underexplored. METHODS: Viable bovine myocardium was placed in a saline bath in an ex vivo endocardial model. Radiofrequency (RF) ablation was performed using three different ablation catheters: 3.5 mm open irrigated (OI), 4, and 8 mm. Variable flow rates of surrounding bath fluids were applied to simulate standard flow, high flow, and no flow. For in vivo epicardial ablation, 24 rats underwent a single OI ablation and performed with circulating saline (30 ml/min; n = 12), versus those immersed in saline without circulation (n = 12). RESULTS: High flow reduced ablation lesion volumes for all three catheters. In no-flow endocardial CE, both 4 mm and OI catheters produced smaller lesions compared with standard flow. However, the 8 mm catheter produced the largest lesions in a no-flow CE. Ablation performed in an in vivo model with CE resulted in smaller lesions compared with ablation performed in a no-flow environment. No statistically significant differences in steam pops were found among the groups. CONCLUSION: A higher endocardial CE flow can decrease RF effectiveness. Cardiac tissue subjected to no endocardial CE flow may also limit RF for 4 mm catheters, but not for OI catheters; these findings may have implications for RF ablation safety and efficacy, especially in the epicardial space without circulating fluid or in the endocardium under varying flow conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nussinovitch et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: