Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Theoretical analysis demonstrates a multi-stakeholder collaborative education framework for college students, suggesting improved pedagogical integration across digital and physical domains.
Under the requirements of moral education and the comprehensive reform of “three-pronged education”, collaborative education has become a central path for improving the pertinence, effectiveness, and attractiveness of ideological and political education for college students. Current practice still faces insufficient subject coordination, fragmented fields, scattered resources, unsmooth mechanisms, solidified practice models, and difficulty in quantitative evaluation. Based on system theory, synergy theory, and ideological and political education theory, this study reconstructs the logic of practice-oriented ideological and political education with full participation, whole-process integration, full coverage, and all-element collaboration. It analyzes the collaborative mechanisms among universities, governments, enterprises, communities, and families, and proposes a five-in-one practice model covering classroom teaching, campus culture, social practice, cyberspace, and community-family participation. A multidimensional evaluation system is further built to measure ideological guidance, value shaping, practical development, growth progress, and collaborative support. The model can be extended to wireless-networked education platforms and electromagnetic-compatible digital interaction spaces used in smart campuses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
G. Cao (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: