Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The alpha voltaic effect in 4H-SiC Schottky barrier diodes (SBDs) with nickel (Ni) and titanium (Ti) as Schottky contacts is demonstrated using 5.5-MeV energetic²⁴¹ Amalpha source of 1.414-μCi/cm2 activity. The as-developed SBDs for high-resolution alpha spectroscopy are used here with no further optimization for alpha voltaic response. The fabricated Ni/4H-SiC Schottky diodes exhibited an open-circuit voltage(VOC)of 0.4 V, a short-circuit current density(JSC)of nearly175~pA / cm², and an energy conversion efficiency of 0.28% upon continuous alpha exposure, whereas relatively inferior performance is observed for Ti/4H-SiC Schottky diodes withVOCof 0.15 V,JSCof 2.15 pA/cm2, and a conversion efficiency of 0.0005% though the Ti/4H-SiC SBD upon annealing at400~∘C in nitrogen ambient exhibited better electrical characteristics compared to the Ni/4H-SiC SBDs. The analysis of the electrical characteristics of both the Schottky diodes reveals the higher surface state densities (NSS) for Ti/4H-SiC SBD compared to Ni/4H-SiC SBD. Significant degradation in the battery performance (VOCdegraded to 18% andJSCreduced to 30% of their initial values) is noticed upon long-term alpha exposure of the Ni/SiC SBDs beyond 30 h. Meanwhile, no major changes are observed in Ti/4H-SiC SBD alpha voltaic cell performance with irradiation. Free-carrier-depth profiles extracted from C–V measurements of the irradiated devices reveal a considerable carrier removal possibly due to bulk damage. In addition, a significant increase in the density of surface states(Nₛₛ)is noted upon prolonged alpha exposure leading to inferior performance of the SBDs. Hence, further improvements in the alphavoltaic performance of the Ni/SiC SBD may be obtained by passivating the surface.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shilpa et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: