Positive Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Reduces Arrhythmic Events After Elective Generator Change in Patients with Primary Prevention CRT‐D

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) are effective therapies for heart failure (HF) patients with cardiac dyssynchrony. Patients receiving primary prevention CRT-defibrillator that positively remodel might no longer qualify for ICD indication due to CRT-induced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement. We aimed to evaluate the outcome of CRT-D patients at the time of device replacement (DR). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients undergoing primary prevention CRT-D DR were prospectively included from November 2007 to March 2011 in 2 centers. CRT response was as defined as ≥1 NYHA class improvement and an increase in LVEF ≥10%. Before DR, all patients underwent echocardiography and device interrogation. Patients without theoretical ongoing ICD indication (TOII) at DR were defined as those with LVEF ≥40% without appropriate ICD therapy (appropriate therapy) during the first ICD service-life. A total of 107 consecutive patients were enrolled. Sixty-one patients (57%) were considered CRT responders after the index procedure. At the time of DR (56.4 ± 14.4 months from initial implant), 87% of CRT responders were free of appropriate therapy, compared with 70% of CRT nonresponders (P = 0.02). Thirty-nine patients (37%) did not meet the criteria for TOII. During follow-up (mean 26.4 ± 14.4 months after DR), 37 patients (95%) without TOII were free of appropriate therapy versus 49 of 68 patients (72%) with ongoing TOII (P = 0.007). By multivariable analysis, the only independent predictor of appropriate therapy after DR was TOII (hazard ratio = 6.43; P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Absence of theoretical ICD indication occurs in more than one-third of CRT-D patients undergoing DR. In addition, appropriate therapy rate is relatively low (2.2% per year) in this subgroup of patients.