Why the study?
Does S-(-)-amlodipine nicotinate reduce diastolic blood pressure more than ramipril in patients with essential hypertension?
Does S-(-)-amlodipine nicotinate reduce diastolic blood pressure more than ramipril in patients with essential hypertension?
S-(-)-amlodipine nicotinate 2.5 mg daily is more effective than ramipril 2.5 mg daily in lowering blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension over 8 weeks.
Favors S-(-)-amlodipine nicotinate over ramipril for greater DBP reduction; extends RCT evidence for CCBs versus ACEIs in essential hypertension.
The aim of this study was to compare the antihypertensive effect of S-(-)-amlodipine nicotinate with ramipril in patients with essential hypertension. Methods: Total 138 patients (54.5 10.5 years, 69 males) were enrolled in this study between 2008 and 2010. Amlodipine 2.5 mg or ramipril 2.5 mg was treated once in a day for 8 weeks. Epidemiologic analysis was performed in intend-to-treat group. Efficacy analysis was performed in the differences of diastolic blood pressure in study groups. Abnormal reactions were divided with severities and drug-relationship. Results: The change of diastolic blood pressures were more prominent with -12.7 7.02 mm Hg in amlodipine group, and -9.6 7.38 mm Hg in ramipril group (p = 0.023). The change of systolic blood pressures was higher in amlodipine group with -18.1 7.91 mm Hg, and -14.3 11.96 mm Hg in ramipril group (p = 0.047). Blood pressure normalization rates were 81.3% (48 of 59 patients) in amlodipine group, and 61.4% (35 of 57 patients) in ramipril group (p = 0.017). Abnormal reaction occurred in 5.8% (4 of 68 patients) of amlodipine group and 14.2% (10 of 70 patients) of ramipril group (p = 0.102). The most frequent abnormal reaction was respiratory symptom. Conclusions: S-Amlodipine-Nicotinate was more effective than ramipril in hypertensive patients without significant abnormal reaction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: