Why the study?
Does R/S ratio variability in lead V1 between selected 1-minute ECG fragments predict incomplete biventricular pacing in patients receiving CRT?
Does R/S ratio variability in lead V1 between selected 1-minute ECG fragments predict incomplete biventricular pacing in patients receiving CRT?
R/S ratio variability in lead V1 during specific 1-minute fragments of a 24-hour ECG can serve as a quick predictor of incomplete biventricular pacing in CRT patients, even when device interrogation suggests adequate pacing.
May flag incomplete BIVP missed by interrogation in CRT; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: About 30% of patients do not have an effective cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Routine assessment of CRT by devices interrogation (DI) is not entirely reliable. Additional information provide detailed QRS analysis in 24-hour ECG, however it is time-consuming. The aim of the study was the assessment of R/S ratio variability in lead V1 between selected fragments of 24-hour ECG as a predictor of incomplete biventricular pacing (BIVP) during full 24-hour ECG. METHODS: The 12-lead 24-hour ECGs of 43 patients with sinus rhythm were studied. During 24-hour ECG the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) was performed. The CRT was assessed by analyzing DI and full 24-hour ECG and four 1-minute fragments of these ECG recordings: during the minimum and the maximum heart rate and at the 1st and last minute of 6MWT. RESULTS: During DI the effective (>95%) BIVP was present in 36 patients (83.7%). Analysis of full 24-hour ECG confirmed appropriate BIVP in 31 patients (72%) and suspected incomplete BIVP (≤95%) in 12 patients (28%). In 9/12 patients the R/S ratio variability in lead V1 was visible between selected ECG fragments of 24-hour ECG. These results were not associated with the results of DI but were significantly associated with full 24-hour analysis of QRS. CONCLUSIONS: R/S variability in lead V1 between selected fragments of 24-hour ECG can be considered a predictor of potentially incomplete BIVP confirmed by further complete 24-hour ECG analysis in patients with appropriate pacing reported during DI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pyszno‐Prokopowicz et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: