Chronic endothelin-1 stimulation facilitates ventricular arrhythmias by altering electrical restitution and increasing repolarization variability in a rabbit model.
Endothelin-1 pathway merits study as arrhythmia target; extends preclinical models but leaves open clinical translation.
Chronically elevated levels of endothelin-1 (ET-1) have been detected in several cardiovascular diseases. In this study, we investigated the chronic effects of ET-1 on the electrophysiological characteristics expected to influence the genesis and maintenance of ventricular arrhythmia (VA). Rabbits were randomized to ET-1 (ET-1 group) or 0.9% saline (control group) for 2 weeks. The S1-S2 protocol and S1-S1 dynamic pacing were performed to assess the action potential duration restitution (APDR) and to induce APD alternans or VA in 4 sites of Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts. The beat-to-beat variability of repolarization was quantified as short-term variability and long-term variability. Compared with the control group, chronic ET-1 administration significantly prolonged QT intervals, APD at 90% repolarization (APD₉₀), and effective refractory period (ERP), steepened the maximum slopes of the APDR curve, decreased the ERP/APD₉₀ ratio, and increased the spatial dispersions of APD₉₀, ERP, and maximum slopes (P < 0.05 for all). Moreover, chronic ET-1 administration markedly increased the short-term variability and long-term variability (P < 0.01 for all). APD alternans occurred in both groups, but the threshold of APD alternans was decreased at all sites in the ET-1 group (P < 0.01 for all). We also observed that chronic ET-1 stimulation significantly increased the incidence and duration of the VA episodes. These results suggest that chronic stimulation with ET-1 facilitated VA by steepening the APDR curve and increasing the spatial dispersion of APDR and beat-to-beat variability of repolarization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: