Why the study?
Is the Xenon 133 clearance method valid for measuring muscle blood flow compared to venous occlusion plethysmography in normal individuals and patients with intermittent claudication?
Is the Xenon 133 clearance method valid for measuring muscle blood flow compared to venous occlusion plethysmography in normal individuals and patients with intermittent claudication?
The Xenon 133 clearance method is a valid technique for measuring muscular blood flow in humans, showing comparable maximal flow rates to venous occlusion plethysmography.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Xenon-133 clearance may support muscle blood flow assessment in normals; leaves open validation and utility in intermittent claudication.
Calf blood flow has been measured simultaneosuly by the Xe 133 clearance method in m. tibialis anterior and m. gastrocnemius and by venous occlusion plethysmography in normal man and in patients with intermittent claudication. At rest Xe 133 muscle blood flow ( MBF xe ) averaged 1.6 ml/100 g/min while plethysmographic total calf blood flow (calf BF) was higher in each instance and averaged 3.0 ml/100 g/min. There was no difference between normal legs and legs with occlusive vascular disease in this respect. Following one to five minutes of arterial occlusion, reactive hyperemia was seen with both methods, the rapid changes being most readily observed with the plethysmographic method. After exhaustive muscular exercise during ischemia in normal man maximal MBF xe averaged 40 ml/100 g/min (48 ml/100 g/min over m. tibialis anterior and 32 ml/100 g/min over m. gastrocnemius). The maximal calf BF averaged 42 ml/100 g/min. The rate of return of blood flow to the resting level was also quite similar with both methods. In the patients with claudication both methods showed a subnormal and delayed hyperemic reaction following ischemic work, but the MBF xe was consistently lower. The results obtained indicate that the Xe 133 modification of Kety's local clearance method for measurement of muscular blood flow in man is essentially valid.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lassen et al. (1965) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: