Why the study?
Does sodium nitroprusside provide clinical benefits that justify its cost in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting?
Does sodium nitroprusside provide clinical benefits that justify its cost in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting?
Despite significant cost increases, sodium nitroprusside remains an appropriate agent during CABG to reduce vasospasm, inflammation, AF, and AKI, though other agents are preferred for postoperative hypertension.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Justifies the continued intraoperative use of sodium nitroprusside despite rising costs; confirms its ple.
Purpose: Sodium nitroprusside is a vasodilator frequently used in the coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) setting. However, the price of a 50-mg vial of sodium nitroprusside increased from $5.00 in 2003 to up to $900 in 2016. The purpose of this review is to help health systems balance high-quality patient care with economic responsibility. Methods: A MEDLINE literature search was performed using the search terms “nitroprusside” and “coronary artery bypass.” All English-language trials in human subjects assessing the use of sodium nitroprusside in the setting of CABG were evaluated. The references of these studies were also reviewed. Results: In the setting of CABG, sodium nitroprusside attenuates conduit vasospasm and reduces the incidence of inflammation, atrial fibrillation, and acute kidney injury after surgery. However, other vasodilators are more effective at maintaining postoperative blood pressure at goal. Conclusions: Despite its cost, sodium nitroprusside may be an appropriate agent to use during CABG operations, but other agents should be considered for treatment of postoperative hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gibson et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: