Why the study?
Does visit-to-visit blood pressure variability correlate with coronary plaque vulnerability in patients with hypertension and stable angina?
Does visit-to-visit blood pressure variability correlate with coronary plaque vulnerability in patients with hypertension and stable angina?
Visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability correlates with coronary plaque volume (lipid arc) but not plaque vulnerability (fibrous cap thickness) in patients with stable angina.
Visit-to-visit SBP variability was associated with lipid arc but not cap thickness; leaves open its role in plaque vulnerability.
BACKGROUND: Blood pressure variability (BPV), especially visit-to-visit BPV, has been reported to be a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. The impact of BPV on coronary plaque vulnerability remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between BPV and coronary plaque vulnerability. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From August 2013 to May 2014, 36 patients with both hypertension and stable angina pectoris who underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention guided by frequency-domain optical coherence tomography were investigated retrospectively. The size of the lipid cores and the thickness of the fibrous cap covering the lipid core were measured by frequency-domain optical coherence tomography, and we calculated the blood pressure coefficient of variation (CV) and SD as intraindividual visit-to-visit BPV. RESULTS: Both SD and CV of systolic blood pressure (SBP) correlated positively with lipid arc (SBP-SD: r=0.68, P<0.01; SBP-CV: r=0.64, P<0.01) as well as average SBP (r=0.48, P<0.01). Fibrous cap thickness did not correlate with blood pressure variables or BPV. CONCLUSION: BPV is related to coronary plaque volume, but not to coronary plaque vulnerability. In addition to conventional coronary risk factors, BPV may be a therapeutic target for coronary atherosclerosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aoyama et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: