Why the study?
Is the contractile response to endothelin-1 increased in subcutaneous arteries of patients with essential hypertension compared to controls?
Is the contractile response to endothelin-1 increased in subcutaneous arteries of patients with essential hypertension compared to controls?
The selective increase in contractile response to endothelin-1 in subcutaneous arteries of hypertensive patients suggests its contribution to the development of essential hypertension.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports endothelin-1 role in hypertension; leaves open whether antagonists alter progression or outcomes.
Endothelin-1 has been shown to contribute to basal vascular tone in man. Since endothelin-1 is a potent vasoconstrictor putatively involved in hypertension, we have compared the contractile responses of endothelin-1 and noradrenaline in relation to potassium chloride in subcutaneous resistance arteries from subjects with established essential hypertension with matched controls. Furthermore, with RT-PCR, the occurrence of mRNA for the ETA and ET(B) receptors was shown in the tunica media layer of subcutaneous arteries in controls and hypertensives. The maximum contractile response to endothelin-1 was significantly higher in the subcutaneous arteries of the hypertensives (by 88% with no change in potency) as compared to controls. The responses to noradrenaline, acetylcholine and potassium chloride did not differ between the groups. This selective increase in the contractile response to endothelin-1 might contribute to the development of essential hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Henrik Lind (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: