Why the study?
Does Doppler tissue imaging improve the detection of early systolic function abnormalities in chagasic patients compared to standard echocardiography?
Does Doppler tissue imaging improve the detection of early systolic function abnormalities in chagasic patients compared to standard echocardiography?
Doppler tissue imaging is superior to standard echocardiography in detecting early, incipient myocardial contractility alterations in Chagas' disease patients who still have normal electrocardiograms.
DTI-derived IVCTr may detect subclinical systolic changes in Chagas; leaves open prospective validation before any clinical adoption.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the usefulness of Doppler tissue imaging (DTI) for evaluating the systolic function of chagasic patients with and without electrocardiographic abnormalities, in comparision with echocardiographic study. METHODS: We studied 77 patients divided into 3 groups as follows: group 1 - control; group 2 - chagasic patients with normal electrocardiographic findings; and group 3 - chagasic patients with abnormal electrocardiographic findings. The following parameters were assessed: left ventricular dimensions and ejection fraction, left atrial dimensions and diastolic function on echocardiography. Systolic velocity and regional isovolumic contraction time (IVCTr) of the septal, anterior, lateral, posterior and inferior left ventricular walls were assessed on DTI. RESULTS: Left ventricular cavitary dimensions, ejection fraction and DTI systolic wave showed significant differences between groups 1 and 3 and between groups 2 and 3, which were not found between groups 1 and 2. IVCTr allowed a statistically significant discrimination among the 3 groups. CONCLUSION: DTI allowed discrimination among the different groups assessed, being superior to echocardiography in identifying early abnormalities of contractility, and, therefore, potentially useful for detecting incipient myocardial alterations in chagasic patients with normal electrocardiographic findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barros et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: