Why the study?
Conventional antiplatelet agents increase bleeding risk by indiscriminately inhibiting thrombosis and hemostasis, and identifying a specific druggable target to block integrin αIIbβ3 outside-in signaling in vivo remains an unproven challenge.
Does DCDBS84 prevent thrombosis without compromising hemostasis in mice?
Does DCDBS84 prevent thrombosis without compromising hemostasis in mice?
DCDBS84 demonstrates that targeting the RT loop of Src SH3 can prevent thrombosis without increasing bleeding risk in preclinical models.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May separate antithrombotic efficacy from bleeding risk in mice; leaves open translation of Src SH3 targeting to human therapy.
Conventional antiplatelet agents indiscriminately inhibit both thrombosis and hemostasis, and the increased bleeding risk thus hampers their use at more aggressive dosages to achieve adequate effect. Blocking integrin αIIbβ3 outside-in signaling by separating the β3/Src interaction, yet to be proven in vivo, may nonetheless resolve this dilemma. Identification of a specific druggable target for this strategy remains a fundamental challenge as Src SH3 is known to be responsible for binding to not only integrin β3 but also the proteins containing the PXXP motif. In vitro and in vivo mutational analyses show that the residues, especially E97, in the RT loop of Src SH3 are critical for interacting with β3. DCDBS84, a small molecule resulting from structure-based virtual screening, is structurally validated to be directed toward the projected target. It specifically disrupts β3/Src interaction without affecting canonical PXXP binding and thus inhibits the outside-in signaling-regulated platelet functions. Treatment of mice with DCDBS84 causes a profound inhibition of thrombosis, equivalent to that induced by extremely high doses of αIIbβ3 antagonist, but does not compromise primary hemostasis. Specific targets are revealed for a preferential inhibition of thrombosis that may lead to new classes of potent antithrombotics without hemorrhagic side effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: