Why the study?
Does polyoxyethylene-modified superoxide dismutase (SOD-POE) prevent reperfusion-induced arrhythmias in a rat model of LAD occlusion?
Does polyoxyethylene-modified superoxide dismutase (SOD-POE) prevent reperfusion-induced arrhythmias in a rat model of LAD occlusion?
Pretreatment with a single intravenous bolus of SOD-POE completely prevented severe reperfusion-induced arrhythmias in a rat model, suggesting potential clinical utility.
Does not support clinical use; leaves open translation of SOD-POE to human reperfusion arrhythmias.
Effects of a newly introduced polyoxyethylene-modified superoxide dismutase (SOD-POE) on reperfusion induced arrhythmias were examined in the pentobarbital anesthetized rat. Reperfusion induced arrhythmias were elicited by occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) for 15 min and subsequent release. The LAD occlusion was performed by compressing the artery using a suction cup of 2 mm in diameter placed on the LAD to which negative pressure was applied. The LAD occlusion and release was repeated at an interval of 30 min. SOD-POE or human SOD (h-SOD) (1000 U/kg) was injected intravenously 15 min prior to the occlusion at the second trial of the occlusion. In the control group, various types of arrhythmias including ventricular fibrillation (Vf), ventricular tachycardia (VT), premature ventricular contraction (PVC) and premature atrial contraction (PAC) were elicited immediately after release of the occlusion. In the SOD-POE-treated group, Vf and VT were completely prevented and the numbers of PVC and PAC significantly decreased, while pretreatment with h-SOD did not prevent the occurrence of reperfusion induced arrhythmias. The protective effects of SOD-POE lasted for more than 90-120 min. The plasma half life for SOD-POE was 10.8 hr, while that for h-SOD was 8.6 min. Results indicate that intravenous administration of SOD-POE would provide a new means of preventing reperfusion induced arrhythmias occurring in clinical situations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
GALCIA-ALVES et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: