Why the study?
What is the risk of cardiotoxicity with thioridazine and what are its prescribing trends in New Zealand?
What is the risk of cardiotoxicity with thioridazine and what are its prescribing trends in New Zealand?
While thioridazine can cause QT prolongation and malignant arrhythmias, existing patients on modest doses without risk factors may continue therapy, though new patients should not receive it.
Urges caution with new thioridazine prescriptions; leaves open safe continuation thresholds in stable low-risk patients without prospective data.
OBJECTIVE: To review the production of cardiac arrhythmia by thioridazine, and consider the role of government regulation in light of antipsychotic prescribing trends in New Zealand. METHODS: We conducted a focused literature review on psychotropic-induced cardiotoxicity, including mechanisms and incidence. In addition, we considered trends in antipsychotic prescription in New Zealand and decisions made by regulatory bodies in Australia, North America and the United Kingdom regarding restrictions on the prescription of thioridazine. RESULTS: In general, the cardiotoxicity of antipsychotics, including thioridazine, relates to the ability of these drugs to antagonize voltage-sensitive potassium channels, and thereby prolong the QT interval. This action can lead to malignant arrhythmias in a very small proportion (< < 1%) of patients; the risk may be increased by other drugs or factors which prolong QT or inhibit the metabolism of thioridazine. A review of prescription doses and volumes in New Zealand indicates that thioridazine is prescribed mainly in low doses by non-specialists, and its use has been waning significantly over the past 2 years. These trends predate recent publicity regarding cardiotoxicity. CONCLUSION: Recommendations regarding thioridazine use are presented. Although new patients should not receive this drug, existing patients benefiting from modest doses should not be denied access unless clear-cut risk factors for cardiotoxicity are evident.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Menkes et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: