Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
January 1, 2017Journal of Korean Academy of NursingOpen Access

The Effects of Smart Program for Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (SP-PCI) on Disease-Related Knowledge, Health Behavior, and Quality of Life: A Non-Randomized Controlled Trial

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Does a 12-week smart program (SP-PCI) improve disease-related knowledge, health behaviors, and quality of life in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention?

Population

n=48 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention, recruited from a university hospital in…

Comparison

12-week Smart Program for PCI consisting of… vs Usual care from primary health care providers…

Design

Cohort

Follow-up

12 weeks

Authors

JLJueun LeeHLHaejung Lee

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Supports smartphone post-PCI education; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials before practice change.

Structured PICO

Does a 12-week smart program (SP-PCI) improve disease-related knowledge, health behaviors, and quality of life in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention?

P
Population
n=48 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), recruited from a university hospital in Gyeongsang area.
I
Intervention
12-week Smart Program for PCI (SP-PCI) consisting of self-study of health information using smart phone applications (1/week), walking exercise (>5/week) using smart band, feedback using Kakao talk (2/week), and telephone counseling (1/week).
C
Comparator
Usual care from primary health care providers and a brief health education with basic self-management brochure after the PCI.
O
Outcome
Coronary disease-related knowledge, health behaviors, and quality of life at 12 weeks.patient reported

A 12-week smartphone-based intervention significantly improved disease-related knowledge, health behaviors, and quality of life in patients following percutaneous coronary intervention.

Limitations

  • Small sample size (further study with a wider population is needed)

Cite This Study

Lee et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8a860b4c30e1095aecb93bhttps://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2017.47.6.756
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effects of multidisciplinary exercise management on patients after percutaneous coronary intervention: A randomized controlled study2022 · 18 citations
  2. 2Study of Patient Information after percutaneous Coronary Intervention (SPICI): should prevention programmes become more effective?2015 · 46 citations
  3. 3Use of a digital health solution after percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomised controlled trial2026
  4. 4Comparison of Health Behavior Change Before and After the Percutaneous Coronary Intervention among Coronary Artery Disease Patients2016
  5. 5The Development and Effects of an Integrated Symptom Management Program for Prevention of Recurrent Cardiac Events after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention2008 · 21 citations