Why the study?
Does trivalent oral polio vaccine induce adequate vaccine virus take and serum antibody response in children in the tropics?
Does trivalent oral polio vaccine induce adequate vaccine virus take and serum antibody response in children in the tropics?
Poor seroconversion rates to oral polio vaccine in children in developing countries are primarily due to poor rates of vaccine virus take rather than an inability to mount an antibody response to intestinal infection.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Poor OPV take, not host response, drives low seroconversion in tropics; leaves open strategies to enhance intestinal replication.
John, T. J. (Dept of Pediatrics, Univ. of Arizona Med. Ctr., Tucson, AZ 85724). Oral polio vaccination of children in the tropics. II. Antibody response in relation to vaccinevirus infection.Am J Epidemiol 102:414–421,1975. Poliovirus antibody response rates following the administration of trivalent oral polio vaccine (OPV) have been poor in several developing countries. In an attempt to determine if poor seroresponse is due to poor rates of vaccine virus “take” or due to poor serum antibody response to intestinal virus infection, both vaccine virus take and serum antibody response were determined in a group of children given two doses of OPV. In the large majority of seronegative children there was good correlation between the absence or presence of vaccine virus excretion and negative or positive seroconversion, thusshowing that the poor seroconversion rates were mainly due to poor rates of vaccine virustake. However, as in several studies from developed countries showing good seroconversionrates, a few instances of antibody response in the absence of detectable virus excretion and fewer instances of virus excretion without detectable antibody response were also found.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
T. Jacob John (1975) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: